Bradenn
28th October 2002, 17:00
Something interesting to consider:
On the one hand, students are advised to trust the teachers and to accept that they have a reason for teaching the way they do even though the student may not understand it (e.g. Daniel doing wax-on, wax-off). In other words, we should not second-guess the instructor even though the training appears unstructured or is not what we expect.
One the other hand, Hatsumi-sensei seems to want each student to bear the responsiblity of discerning the good teacher from the bad. This requires us not trusting the teacher automatically and indeed having to do some second-guessing.
So ... when do you trust and when do you not trust? (obviously there are cases when you don't trust e.g. sexual or physical abuse, outrageous chi power or ninja magic stuff etc.)
Anyone else ever found this issue a bit confusing?
It reminds me of movies like A Few Good Men or Crimson Tide which explore the question of when a soldier should disobey a superior.
----------------
Braden Nicols
On the one hand, students are advised to trust the teachers and to accept that they have a reason for teaching the way they do even though the student may not understand it (e.g. Daniel doing wax-on, wax-off). In other words, we should not second-guess the instructor even though the training appears unstructured or is not what we expect.
One the other hand, Hatsumi-sensei seems to want each student to bear the responsiblity of discerning the good teacher from the bad. This requires us not trusting the teacher automatically and indeed having to do some second-guessing.
So ... when do you trust and when do you not trust? (obviously there are cases when you don't trust e.g. sexual or physical abuse, outrageous chi power or ninja magic stuff etc.)
Anyone else ever found this issue a bit confusing?
It reminds me of movies like A Few Good Men or Crimson Tide which explore the question of when a soldier should disobey a superior.
----------------
Braden Nicols