Joseph Svinth
08-06-2000, 04:32 PM
In an earlier thread on MA research, Richard Tolson wrote:
"Occasionally there are people who are able to go beyond amateur status to building a professional reputation. They are few and far between, but do exist. However, they didn't get there by 'vanity publications', or writing for generic magazines or newspapers."
Okay, what constitutes a "vanity publication"?
Also, since some of the best articles I've ever read about Bruce Lee were in the "Seattle Times" while some of the worst in "Black Belt," isn't it possible that the way to get a professional reputation is not to write solely for specialist publications, but instead to branch into the generic magazines and newspapers?
"Occasionally there are people who are able to go beyond amateur status to building a professional reputation. They are few and far between, but do exist. However, they didn't get there by 'vanity publications', or writing for generic magazines or newspapers."
Okay, what constitutes a "vanity publication"?
Also, since some of the best articles I've ever read about Bruce Lee were in the "Seattle Times" while some of the worst in "Black Belt," isn't it possible that the way to get a professional reputation is not to write solely for specialist publications, but instead to branch into the generic magazines and newspapers?