Do you not think the testing was flawed?
Forgive me for being a bit cynical here, but they didn't explain the QUALITY of the blades. Wouldn't a blade produced by a master be more sturdy and flexible than, say, a blade bought at the local flea market? I watched this, and felt that different quality blades in any of the categories might have made a huge difference on the outcome of the testing. I was just wondering if anyone else thought this as well, or if I had missed a part of the show in which they explained that each blade was made of the same quality?