I take very mild exception to this comment. The arts practiced at the Kodokan, judo in particular, is not a modern term. These kanji ju-do were chosen specifically because a koryu style of tai jutsu and weapons was called jiu-do by its founder in the late 17th century or early 18th century. Jikishin-ryu Ju-do. However it was pronounced, the kanji are identical to Judo. It also used as its main training style, ran, as in ran-dori. While kata was important, ran was at least as important if not more so, especially in the tai-jutsu area of the ryu.
Kyudo and kyujutsu are virtually the same thing, always training with some form of competitive practice. Most koryu of all kinds practiced taryu jiai which is thought only to be the hallmark of the meiji era and on.
Besides, the terms are almost interchangable, the only true difference is in the time it was used. No one really set out to change bujutsu to budo, it just happened, on a timline or continuum of sorts. I sincerely doubt anyone set out to separate them into two columns. Japanese sword arts contain many examples of interchangeable styles, some using jutsu, others -do. Some arts are technically gendai but are taught in the older, classical way while may koryu have adopted some aspects of their arts to some of the ways of gendai. Daito ryu being a large example of not knowing which foot came down first.
But like I said, I only have a mild interest in it, as I am sure most of us have a different take on the subject (do a search of E-budo using those terms and you should find some examples of threads kept in the archives on this very subject). I doubt a new thread would grab very many these days.
Also, it is an exception noted not a law of the jungle to which I protest.