Originally Posted by
Brian Owens
Although "virtually" means "not in fact," most people use it to mean "almost" or "practically" -- "for all intenents and purposes" even. None of those apply here.
Actually, the meaning I meant here, "almost; nearly" applies just fine. The existance of a few sword arts that use very close grips doesn't change anything. The use of "virtually" accounts for a few exceptions.
I also wouldn't consider "two fingers' width" -- for example -- as being "roughly" a fist's width. Not even "almost" a fist's width. Yet two fingers' width is one commonly used measure in some schools.
Fair enough. "Roughly", in my mind, included a few fingers closer or farther apart, but if you didn't get that, then I didn't make my point clear.
Other schools go the opposite way. I have seen swords with long tsuka held with the hands more than
two fists' width apart. That's not what I'd call "roughly a fist's length" either.
From my same post: "And what I've seen of Kashima Shinto ryu, the main influence on the Iwama aikiken, a particularly wide grip, perhaps a fist and a half, is used."
Again, my point was not that every school uses exactly one fist-length distance. I thought I'd included enough qualifiers there. Merely that, with a few exceptions, a clearly separated two-hand grip (enough for one to grab the hilt between the hands) is characteristic of Japanese swordsmanship.
Originally Posted by
Ron Tisdale
Yagyu shinkage ryu as well...I believe.
Yagyu shinkage ryu uses roughly a fist length, Ron (give or take a finger or two). At least from gripping fingers to gripping fingers. It can be difficult to tell, though, because the thumb and forefingers are relaxed and gently curved around the tsuka, sometimes creeping up, making it look like the hands are closer together.
Josh Reyer
Swa sceal man don, žonne he ęt guše gengan ženceš longsumne lof, na ymb his lif cearaš. - The Beowulf Poet