Jigen Ryu practices a number of kata. Their tree-striking practice seems to aim at developing proper form, strong kiai, and good distance control as a foundation before students move on to studying kata. I rather suspect that many old schools had similar "basic training" in the old days.
As far as kata go, the kata of Jigen Ryu that I've seen (only on video, I'm afraid) look fairly standard. They practice a version of Enpi that has interesting parallels to the Enpi practiced by Yagyu Shinkage Ryu (apparently the founder of Jigen Ryu learned Enpi from Taisha Ryu, founded by a student of Kamiizumi). Their more advanced kata appear to be very brief and direct, but loaded with meaning-- I find them to be a bit similar to the original, armored version of Yagyu Shinkage Ryu's Sangakuen, which are very simple, short kata (in contrast to the longer and more complex kata practiced, say, at the omote level of KSR).
With regards to your comment on "slow, predetermined kata," you might want to do some more research. Watch a video of Otake Sensei of Katori Shinto Ryu or of Tetsuzan Kuroda Sensei of Komagawa Kaishin Ryu and I challenge you to call their practice "slow." Kata are pre-arranged, but they are also subject to change. You might practice a kata the same way five or six hundred times, and then just when you are getting comfortable with rote movements, your instructor will throw something unexpected at you to test your reactions and to force you to pay attention. Properly done, kata are always "alive" and full of real intent. They don't teach practitioners a series of rote responses to a particular attack-- "He comes in like this so you do this this and this"-- but rather teach the practitioner to appreciate distance, timing, openings, and proper mentality.
If you ever think that kata training wouldn't work, please remember that kata training has been proven to work. All kenjutsu schools that I know of practice kata, and have for centuries. If kata didn't work, they wouldn't have been practiced. Swordsmen who trained in kata would have died in battle rather than surviving to found their own schools. To put it another way, if "slow, predetermined" kata are not good training for battle, why did so many men who were veterans of the battlefield teach their students using kata, and why did their students, after getting back from their own battles, continue to use kata?
Last edited by DDATFUS; 24th April 2008 at 18:41.
David Sims
"Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum." - Terry Pratchet
My opinion is, in all likelihood, worth exactly what you are paying for it.