Originally Posted by
Bidouleroux
...it's more blackmail and coercion than violent rape. But since feminists have redefined "rape" to include any sort of intercourse that include penetration, pretty much every sexually active man and woman, hetero- or homosexual, has committed at least one rape in their life.
"Any penetration" isn't rape. Rape is not taking "no" for an answer. Sex through blackmail, coercion, intimidation, threats, or any other form of actual or implied violence, or having sex with anyone incapable of giving informed consent, is rape.
Originally Posted by
Bidouleroux
Do you really think a game called "Hitman" is any more deserving to be played? Or a game called "Postal" (after the expression "going postal" and the killings of USPS employees, though the game is not connected to these events), where in the first mission you have to piss on someone's grave? Or a game called "Manhunt" where you are the one hunting people? Or a game like Grand Theft Auto where the whole point is to make your place in the crime underworld? These games were all published quite normally in the United States. Of course there was uproar, but since it's not rape I guess you're okay with these games being made.
Why would you think that those of us who are against "rape games" are "okay with" the games you name?
I like people who play rape and/or violent games better than the real rapists and/or killers that litter our prisons. But hey, that's just me.
I don't like either of them, and there is a statistical probability that the former are more likely to become the latter than are those who don't seek such immoral gratification.
Yours in Budo,
---Brian---