Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Oda Nobunaga

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Deurne, Antwerp, Belgium
    Posts
    443
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default Oda Nobunaga

    I am in a discussion with someone about this picture here:



    He claims that this is a genuine painting by Gioanni Nicolao, 16th century.
    To me it looks like a photograph.

    I have several reasons why I doubt the "painting" idea.

    1. I doubt the moustache to be contemporary. It looks 19th century.
    2. The mage seems to modern.
    3. The shadowing doesn't look anything like what I know of renaissance or baroque art.
    4. The sepia and grain seem quite photograph like, and not so much like a painting.
    5. This picture looks nothing like the woodblock works on Oda Nobunaga I ever saw. Especially the moustache (again) is a dead give away.

    Now... is there any of you who has a credible source to tell me I am mistaking?
    Achim Steigert
    Bujinkan Te-Nage Dōjō
    Bujinkan Budō Taijutsu
    Shodan - translated: beginners grade

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    4,232
    Likes (received)
    97

    Default

    You missed a letter "v" in the artist's name; Giovanni Nicolao.

    He is credited as teaching the artist brother Emmanuel Pereira (born Yu Wen-hui), who painted this picture of Matteo Ricci, in 1610;


    That came from the page here.


    The picture that you link to, appears in various locations online, including Wikipedia, where it states that the picture was authenticated on the History channel program "Historia". I know that this does not mean anything. I agree that on forst impression it looks photographic. However, that can sometimes happen even in paintings from a time when the likeness is not usually so accurate.

    I notice the moustache is full and wide. This contrasts with how Japanese painters were displaying the moustaches of people from that period. But is that a stylistic difference in the portrait painting, rather than a difference in the person being depicted. Note that the painting I linked to has a full, strong moustache. This reminded me of the kind of moustache still favoured in the middle East, where a moustache is still seen as a sign of virility, maturity and status. Could it be that the Italian jesuit portrait painter conferred the characteristics associated with status, onto the face that other, local, artists showed with a thin moustache.

    I can't offer anything that approaches a qualified opinion. Just a few ideas that came up when I saw the picture and did a Google search. Good luck with finding a more expert answer.
    Last edited by Tripitaka of AA; 14th November 2010 at 22:01.
    David Noble
    Shorinji Kempo (1983 - 1988)
    I'll think of a proper sig when I get a minute...

    For now, I'm just waiting for the smack of the Bo against a hard wooden floor....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Deurne, Antwerp, Belgium
    Posts
    443
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default

    Now *THAT'S* a 16th 17th century painting!
    Still doesn't answer my suspicion about the picture I showed.
    Achim Steigert
    Bujinkan Te-Nage Dōjō
    Bujinkan Budō Taijutsu
    Shodan - translated: beginners grade

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Naha, Okinawa
    Posts
    220
    Likes (received)
    7

    Default

    There is a large painting of Oda Nobunaga in Gifu Castle, which I used to visit frequently. The painting displayed here looks like a different person in my opinion.

    This is the painting I remember in Gifu:
    Nullius in verba

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Deurne, Antwerp, Belgium
    Posts
    443
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default

    Now THAT is a painting. And THAT is a contemporary 16th century moustache.
    And this guy also looks a lot more like the guy on the woodblock images.

    Do you know if it is a contemporary painting, by any chance?
    Achim Steigert
    Bujinkan Te-Nage Dōjō
    Bujinkan Budō Taijutsu
    Shodan - translated: beginners grade

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    4,232
    Likes (received)
    97

    Default

    Just for curiosity, I typed "portraits 16th century" into Google images, and it was quite astonishing. Some of the paintings are incredibly "photographic" and very attractive.

    I chose the earlier one because it was pained by someone who had been taught by Nicolao, and would therefore be likely to have a similar style. But his painting was not done from "life" and that might account for at least some of the non-realism.

    Another thing from Google images... is the complete lack of any other online representations of any other pictures attributed to Giovanni Nicolao. That Oda Nobunaga picture comes up a lot... but nothing else by that artist.
    David Noble
    Shorinji Kempo (1983 - 1988)
    I'll think of a proper sig when I get a minute...

    For now, I'm just waiting for the smack of the Bo against a hard wooden floor....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Deurne, Antwerp, Belgium
    Posts
    443
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tripitaka of AA View Post
    The picture that you link to, appears in various locations online, including Wikipedia, where it states that the picture was authenticated on the History channel program "Historia". I know that this does not mean anything. I agree that on forst impression it looks photographic. However, that can sometimes happen even in paintings from a time when the likeness is not usually so accurate.
    Ouch! I somehow missed this part of your reply! This is some information I can work with. I will search further for information on Historia.

    Thanks a lot!

    And yes, 16th century painters could definitely paint astonishingly accurate. You have to be VERY knowledgeable to see mistakes in many paintings.
    Sometimes perspective isn't perfect, as the concept of "perception" has only been (re)discovered.

    This is the 15th century painter Jan Van Eyck. He's been an incredible painter. The rest of Europe was still painting stick figures while he did this, in a manner of speaking:

    Look at this painting. It's amazing for its time, 1434!

    But if you know what to look for, you'll see the little mistakes he made with perspective. He didn't yet know that the "perspective lines" (dunno if this is the correct English terminology, in my native language it's "escape lines" but I think "perspective lines" makes more sense in English) have to lead to one single point instead of several points.


    Another example is the famous painting by Sandro Botticelli, the Birth of Venus (1486).

    At first glance, this is a rather perfect painting.
    At the second look, you'll see (and as a martial artist you should see that easily) that Venus cannot stand up like that. He complete weight is off of her feet. She has to topple to the right (from viewers perspective).
    At the third, closer watch, you'll find that there isn't "rea" depth. He tries to generate depth by adding the erratic coast line and the trees to the right and even already by making the nearby parts darker than the parts that are nearer to the horizon. Yet it's not really perspective. Look at the waves. They hardly are smaller, the more you go to the horizon.
    The last perspective problem is that they are all equally far away. They aren't realistically positioned. They are really on one single line. The easiest way to see that, is to compare the heads. The heads are all exactly equally large, which isn't the case if the distance between them and the viewer isn't the same. Remark: the head of the man is a bit smaller than the head of the girl who embraces him. Quite unlikely. Men usually have larger heads than women.

    Then the four persons in the painting don't look as they are "in" the painting.
    Especially the girl to the right. She doesn't seem to touch the ground, and there is no real shadow either.

    B U T: even with those details, it's AMAZING!
    Especially when you know what the previous stage was, being things like this:

    As I said: hardly more than just stick figures.
    Achim Steigert
    Bujinkan Te-Nage Dōjō
    Bujinkan Budō Taijutsu
    Shodan - translated: beginners grade

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    34
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default

    At the risk of further derailing this thread, this is my favourite 16th century portrait.

    Giovanni Bellini's portrait of The Doge Leonardo Loredan ~1501
    Last edited by Endboss; 17th November 2010 at 08:19. Reason: Bad image link

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Deurne, Antwerp, Belgium
    Posts
    443
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default

    1501? Astonishing!
    It looks a lot more modern than that! Fascinating how quickly the art of painting evolved from the rather primitive romanic and gothic art into the amazingly lively and detailed renaissance art!
    Achim Steigert
    Bujinkan Te-Nage Dōjō
    Bujinkan Budō Taijutsu
    Shodan - translated: beginners grade

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •