Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: Daito-ryu Training and Transmission

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    2
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default Daito-ryu Training and Transmission

    Hello all,
    My question today involves the differences in training among the different Daito-Ryu schools, specifically a Daibukan affiliated dojo (lineage is traced through Kenkichi Ohgami and Takuma Hisa) versus other Daito-Ryu instruction. I am soon going to begin training in a dojo with said lineage, and was just wondering what more experienced practicioners of DRAJJ would say about such a school versus others.

    On a complete side note, the same dojo also has an Aikido class training there regularly, so I was considering training in Aikido also. Any thoughts?

    I look forward to your responses
    Best Regards,

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA USA
    Posts
    2,565
    Likes (received)
    46

    Default

    Mr. Vukorepa,

    These are good questions. They are also subjects that have been discussed here at length:

    The Various Daito-ryu Branches

    Aikido & Daito-ryu: Differences and Similarities?/ Rengokai

    Aikijujutsu vs Aikido:

    http://www.e-budo.com/forum/showthre...utsu-vs-Aikido

    This whole forum is an archive of compiled threads. There are many other threads that you might find informative if you use the search function or browse through the pages. Feel free to revive an old thread if there is something you'd like to add.

    Regards,
    Last edited by Cady Goldfield; 13th July 2014 at 22:05.
    Nathan Scott
    Nichigetsukai

    "Put strength into your practice, and avoid conceit. It is easy enough to understand a strategy and guard against it after the matter has already been settled, but the reason an opponent becomes defeated is because they didn't learn of it ahead of time. This is the nature of secret matters. That which is kept hidden is what we call the Flower."

    - Zeami Motokiyo, 1418 (Fūshikaden)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    2
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default

    Nathan,

    Thank you very much for the informative threads. It seems I have a bit of studying to do.

    Best Regards,

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Southern Ontario
    Posts
    19
    Likes (received)
    0

    Default

    Just to add a quick note.

    If you have never studied Aikido or DRAJJ before, I would advise against taking the two arts together. Choose one or the other. Doing both, while perhaps making your Aikido more 'combative', will negatively effect your Daito Ryu training. The body movements are diffirent in each art, and when it comes to Daito Ryu, having proper movement is key (it's not a strength based art).

    I'm not sure where I stand on the whole crosstraining before shodan issue, but either way, the movements are diffirent, yet similar enough to confuse and frustrate you.

    That's it. Enjoy the reading.

    Chris
    Chris Ames

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    233
    Likes (received)
    31

    Default

    MERGED FROM ANOTHER THREAD - NS

    Quote Originally Posted by Cady Goldfield View Post
    The irony is, I suspect, is that the skill was all in the aiki, the internal training - the instructions for which don't seem to come up in the written curriculum. That's the part that must be transmitted person-to-person. Once it's inculcated, then you can take jujutsu, weapons, striking, etc. from wherever and whatever and apply those mechanical skills with aiki as the source of power.

    What Sagawa talked about the most (and is all over Kimura's book) was his own solo training. That was not jujutsu.
    Yeah, this is the story. Takeda received training that was deep and wide, polished himself with a long and grueling musha shugyo, and then went on the road teach an art called Daito ryu to thousands of students. When really, the true art was a secret that he taught to only a few students, and insisted that they be careful to only teach it to a very few of their students. And so today we have millions of people training in various descendants of Takeda's Daito ryu that are training in something that is empty and not the real art.

    This is a horrible story. One of the worst things about it is the idea it plants in your head that you've wasted your years of training. If this is the case, nobody should bother training any aiki art.

    Every art has something like aiki - inner secrets that are reserved for the soke or shihans that are given to them after years of training, not before. Most students know they will never receive those particular teachings, because they are not on track to be a successor or receive a full license. But they trust that their training is immensely valuable anyway. In the old days, you had to give your people skills that they could use to survive fights. If they died because you were withholding the secrets, you wouldn't get students anymore. So there was a built-in guarantee of integrity.

    There is always this little voice in the back of your head telling you that Takeda had sort of a "there's a sucker born every minute" attitude and he was purposely selling BS. He'd get up on stage and use his aiki power to generate some technique on the spot. Then he'd rake in the money as everyone paid him three yen to learn it, then he'd laugh as he imagined them going back to their homes and practicing these useless little dances over and over again like little clockwork toys! In the meantime, he'd teach solo exercises and aiki to Ueshiba, Sagawa, Horikawa, etc, telling them that they should only pass this on to a few.

    Further down the line, you get all of this bitterness, disrespect, and factionalization. You get a huge perceived value in these secrets. People trying to scheme the rights of succession away from people they've trained alongside for decades. People breaking oaths they made to teachers.

    I re-read a thread on here from a decade ago where Wayne Muramoto.was talking about how Takenouchi ryu has always been taught at one dojo in Okayama prefecture, but there was a branching that allowed the art to be taught in some other dojos in Okayama, and then the Bichu den broke off and spread all around Japan and other parts of the world. By the 70s and 80s people from the Bichu den found out about the home dojo and - what did they do? Insist they were the real school and those people in Okayama were nobodys? Nope, they started building relationships with the home branch, everybody getting together to train together and share notes on what they were doing, to bring the art together and make it better.

    Maybe that's just a jujutsu thing.
    Last edited by Nathan Scott; 13th July 2013 at 00:42. Reason: MERGED FROM ANOTHER THREAD

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA USA
    Posts
    2,565
    Likes (received)
    46

    Default

    You know, Sokaku and Daito-ryu keep getting a bad rap in regards to the holding back of transmission to students. I really disagree. From my observation, Daito-ryu is hard to learn for three reasons:

    1) It is hard to find legitimate orthodox instruction. Even when you do, you still have the typical issues of whether the dojo is appropriate and whether the teacher is appropriate and of good character. This issue is nobody's fault - it's just harder to find legitimate instruction in classical arts.

    2) Daito-ryu is more to difficult to learn than many other arts - especially gendai arts, because it is unusually sophisticated, and contains deep teachings that take years of correct repetitive training and introspection to grasp. This requires that the student be serious minded about training and intellectual in regards to analyzing the teachings. Martial arts isn't for everyone to begin with, but Daito-ryu requires even more attention and sacrifice than most arts. This lowers the number of long-term serious students significantly, and doesn't even take in to account other elements, such as natural ability, opportunity, etc. Those that only want the quick basics of how to fight would be better off going to a krav maga dojo, or boxing. Classical arts are designed for long-term training.

    3) Daito-ryu has a history of secrecy, and most orthodox branches are still conservative to varying degrees about releasing inner teachings to those not properly initiated. This means that, in some cases at least, the student knows little about the specifics of the art until they reach the appropriate level of initiation. However, they still learn the skills through correct repetitive training, but they just understand little of the structure or the art and where the teachings are going for the first few years. This means that studying Daito-ryu requires more patience than most arts, as well as trust that your instructor is of good character and is concerned about passing on the art to future generations (ie: serious students). Most students these days are not much on patience or perseverance. This issue is the result of the historical context of the art, and if the art didn't have this kind of history, then it wouldn't be as deep or sophisticated as it is. So, oh well.

    **

    The three reasons I list, which are of course just my opinion, are not the fault of the art, or (most) its teachers. It simply just is what it is. But it does mean that there are even less serious exponents of the art than can be found in other traditional Japanese arts right now, of which can usually be counted on one hand for each dojo.

    When it comes to koryu arts, they all have levels of initiation and inner teachings. In such arts, students cannot be said to truly "understand" the art until they have received the full teachings. They may understand a lot, or most of the art, and they can certainly become powerful & skilled fighters *regardless* of whether they have received the full teachings or not. But koryu arts teach in steps, through deepening levels of initiation, unlike most gendai arts, which tend to simply teach more advanced methods based on the speed that you learn.

    In Daito-ryu, aiki is an important element to improving the effectiveness and reliability of the techniques. Looking at the scrolls, the term "aiki" is not mentioned anywhere in the Hiden Mokuroku, but is mentioned starting in the scrolls that follow. So it is not correct to state that the teachings of aiki are reserved for one or two students. They are reserved for those who have already received the first level of initiation (traditionally). This also means that aiki is not even reserved as a "gokui", or, highest level of teaching. Just the second level (!) However, being exposed to aiki, and understanding what it is, or how to use it, is going to vary case by case. But even Sokaku said it was easy to steal the secrets if you knew what to look for, right? If you are a student of good character, who conducts themselves appropriately, and you study under a teacher of good character, then the only reason you won't understand or become skilled at inner teachings such as aiki (in most cases) is because of YOU!! Nobody can make a student skilled - the student must do their own work. Even in modern arts, the teacher's job is still to simply guide them along the way - not force feed them and try to do the work for them.

    As I've said a few times already, Sokaku taught a lot of people throughout Japan through conducting seminars. There was no dojo to go train at. Those that wanted to continue learning had to make significant sacrifices to make it happen, much like being a study group leader today. While Sokaku, and many other classical teachers, believed that it was not good to spread the inner teachings of their art to widely, what they are really saying is to not be indiscriminate about who you teach, and to what level you teach them. Anyone who teaches "old school" (non-verbal instruction) knows that it takes A LOT of discipline to not just explain to struggling students how to do everything. In other words, it's not that you are scared others are going to learn your secrets, it's simply that there are very few students of good character who are patient, skilled, intellectually minded, and willing to make the effort necessary to learn such an art. The teacher can only guide them and hope they stick with it long enough to become an asset for the art to future generations by *learning it correctly*.

    As an example, during an entrance interview, I had a new student ask me why he should believe that, of all the people who have studied the art in the past - but failed to learn the ultimate teachings or develop the ultimate skills, he would be one of the very small percentage that would (ie: how do I know I'm not just wasting my time). I told him that as long as he proved to be a person of good character, conducted himself appropriately, and put forth the effort necessary, I would do everything I could to ensure that he progressed in the art. I told him the reason the majority of people fail to reach the ultimate teachings or skills is either due to: poor character and/or behavior; insufficient efforts to learn; quitting; unqualified instruction; or choosing an instructor of poor character or skill level. It was up to him to decide if I was the right teacher for him, but if so, he needed to place some faith and trust in me to do my part. He is still training after 8 years, and has progressed at a faster speed (skill-wise and initiation wise) than the majority of students I've had to date, most of which have quit within the first year of training.

    In any event, I really don't believe that Sokaku would have traveled throughout Japan, innovating a honbu/branch system that either didn't exist yet or was in the process of being developed by a handful of other teachers, if he didn't want to see the art continued. I believe he simply wanted the right people to represent the art. The fact that only a few reach the ultimate levels of any art or could skilfully apply aiki, has more to do with the lack of qualified instruction and the exceptional level of effort that is required, IMO. But aside from the first three points I listed at the beginning of this post, Daito-ryu is not all that different from any other koryu art being taught as far as transmission, and aiki in particular is not reserved for those only at the top.

    Martial arts are designed to be effective and useful from the first day of practice. The longer you study, the more effective the techniques become. Hell, even in Aikido, you apply atemi as necessary at the lower levels of instruction, then discontinue using atemi once the techniques evolve to a higher level. But the techniques are still effective at both levels, right? I've had more than one former student contact me to say that a method that I teach starting from the first day of practice ended up being useful to them in a real situation. I don't think they felt cheated that they didn't stick around to receive the ultimate teachings.

    I guess this ended up turning into a bit of a rant - sorry. It's not directed at anyone in particular, just something that's become a pet peeve I guess.

    Regards,
    Last edited by Cady Goldfield; 13th July 2014 at 22:07.
    Nathan Scott
    Nichigetsukai

    "Put strength into your practice, and avoid conceit. It is easy enough to understand a strategy and guard against it after the matter has already been settled, but the reason an opponent becomes defeated is because they didn't learn of it ahead of time. This is the nature of secret matters. That which is kept hidden is what we call the Flower."

    - Zeami Motokiyo, 1418 (Fūshikaden)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA USA
    Posts
    2,565
    Likes (received)
    46

    Default

    BTW, one last thing.

    While there are a lot of people in a lot of branches or arts that claim some level of connection to Daito-ryu (ie: aiki), this is a perfect example of what I was just talking about.

    You've got a lot of demand for the art, but little (fully) qualified instruction in the orthodox teachings. This is because it can't be taught quickly or recklessly. As such, there are countless arts that claim to teach aiki, aikibudo, aikijujutsu, aiki no jutsu, or some brand of Daito-ryu, that cannot provide the full teachings to their students. That, I agree, is sad. Instructors of such arts should qualify their teachings appropriately, and students in turn should research their art/instructor appropriately before applying for membership. Unfortunately, neither happen enough.

    It's too bad that there is so much interest in aiki and Daito-ryu, but so few people who are willing to make the sacrifices necessary to learn the art and be a part of it's preservation. It ain't just the headmaster that is responsible for the transmission of these arts.

    Regards,
    Last edited by Cady Goldfield; 13th July 2014 at 22:08.
    Nathan Scott
    Nichigetsukai

    "Put strength into your practice, and avoid conceit. It is easy enough to understand a strategy and guard against it after the matter has already been settled, but the reason an opponent becomes defeated is because they didn't learn of it ahead of time. This is the nature of secret matters. That which is kept hidden is what we call the Flower."

    - Zeami Motokiyo, 1418 (Fūshikaden)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    233
    Likes (received)
    31

    Default

    I agree, it seems absurd that Takeda would have kept rolls of all of his hundreds/thousands of students if he didn't want his art to be transmitted. And as a man who had been in many serious fights with skilled opponents, I cannot see why he would want his art to spread such that you would need to learn the inner secrets before it was any good.

    So while I understand that Sagawa put great stock into his solo training for conditioning himself in a certain way, if that was really the key to the art, then that is what Takeda and all of his primary students would have emphasized.

    The problem is - and I apologize for shooting from the hip here instead of waiting until sometime when I have my books handy - you've got these quotes from Sagawa and others (Horikawa, I think, and someone else in Pranin's book) that Takeda warned them to only teach the secrets to a select few and never in public because, to paraphrase, "they are very easy to pick up and steal."

    (Actually what is kind of interesting to me - Tokimune doesn't seem to have said anything like this. And Ueshiba has a doka in "Budo Renshu" that specifically says, don't hold out for secret teachings, those will get you nowhere).

    My point is, if one is starting to doubt their (usually Aikido) training, but is still a "believer" and is looking for a shortcut or a "smarter bet," there is plenty of solid, accepted evidence for them to believe they've been on the wrong track and that they need to find someone that will lay these secrets out for them or they will never get anywhere. And there are people who are prepared to sell to this market.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    3,714
    Likes (received)
    153

    Default

    All it takes for an art to be transmitted to the next generation, is to teach one person, maybe two or three, and instruct them to do the same. Everyone else may get varying degrees of the art's innermost skills.

    This is not unique to Japanese koryu and para-koryu (I just made that up to provide a category for Daito-ryu ); it's rife in the Chinese martial arts. I have heard and read it directly from inheritors of arts, themselves, that they were the appointed heir of the entire art, and that they were to select only one or two successors to receive the entire art.

    Fortunately, some are much more generous with their arts than this. I think that not all art/system-holders intentionally transmit everything they can transmit to just one or two; rather, I believe that often that's just how things happen because it takes a huge amount of dedication, drive and desire to Do The Work. Even disciples may not grasp their teacher's entire system because they don't have the deep-down drive or energy.

    In a sense, it's a meme that mimics the "prime directive" of life itself -- to replace oneself. That's why we have children - to pass on our innermost selves to a new generation. But some people have just one or two children. Others may have 8 (Octomom!) or more. Both have fulfilled their primal genetic obligation to transmit their DNA to future lineage holders.
    Cady Goldfield

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA USA
    Posts
    2,565
    Likes (received)
    46

    Default

    (snip)

    My point is, if one is starting to doubt their (usually Aikido) training, but is still a "believer" and is looking for a shortcut or a "smarter bet," there is plenty of solid, accepted evidence for them to believe they've been on the wrong track and that they need to find someone that will lay these secrets out for them or they will never get anywhere. And there are people who are prepared to sell to this market.
    Yeah, I realize there is definitely no shortage of "instant aiki" out there. I don't study aikido as seriously as other arts I'm studying these days, but I can say that I spend a significant amount of time translating original Japanese texts into English so that I can better understand these arts. The sad thing with Aikido is that the founder wrote and spoke often about the secrets of his art, but the native Japanese (for the most part) didn't bother to research the real meaning of things they didn't understand, and those in the Western world were provided with loose translations of the material that in some places greatly missed the essence of the art. Only recently have a handful or students begun to re-translate and research the meaning of his words, almost 50 years later. Why did it take so long for someone to check the source material and research the meaning??? Again, even in Aikido it is incumbent on the student to put forth some effort to learn outside of waiting for the next instruction.

    The problem is, most people are satisfied with simply knowing what the secrets are. This is an age of instant gratification, and knowing the answers satisfies curiosity, and allows practitioners to feel better about their rank/experience since they now become in a position to explain it to others. But real ability at such skills still takes a lot of effort and dedication, even if someone already explained all the secrets to you. Secondly, traditionally teachers are somewhat slow to initiate people through a deep system such as Daito-ryu for two reasons. First, the teacher & student need to develop a relationship based on trust, which takes a number of years. Anyone can be on good behavior for a few years (I've seen it many times), but eventually they will get tired of acting nice, and will show their true colors. This is something any teacher would want to know prior to trusting a student with the inner secrets. Also, knowledge (and skill) is power, and power corrupts. The biggest downfall in a "powerful" art such as Daito-ryu is that it is very easy to develop an inflated ego. The only way to prevent this is to taper the speed of initiation for some students - as necessary, based on observation - to ensure it doesn't go to their head. A few walk in the door so humble they don't require this, since they self-regulate. But many do, and once a student develops a big ego they will discontinue learning, and will "go the wrong way" with the art (sell out). As such, it is in the student's best interest to deepen their initiation into the secrets in a controlled manner to avoid this *major* pitfall. There is a reason why the art is/was taught this way.

    Personally, every time I've tried to find a better way of teaching such arts, I've come to the realization that the old way is in fact still the best. I've proven this, to myself at least, through teaching in various ways to my own students over the last 20 years. I started off teaching using a typical modern way, and have "evolved" to the old way, which is much harder to do, but produces stronger martial artists.

    And finally, Cady said what I was alluding to using too many words. I believe the low numbers of those receiving the ultimate teachings and skills in arts such as this are more due to the effort required than in a teacher insisting on only teaching 1 or 2 students. I find it hard to believe that if Sokaku had 10 students who were all skilled and qualified to receive Menkyo Kaiden, that he would not issue 10 Menkyo Kaiden. The problem is, good luck finding 10 people who will commit the amount of effort necessary to get there! I maintain that the 1 or 2 comment was meant as a warning to not teach indiscriminately.

    Regards,
    Last edited by Cady Goldfield; 13th July 2014 at 22:09.
    Nathan Scott
    Nichigetsukai

    "Put strength into your practice, and avoid conceit. It is easy enough to understand a strategy and guard against it after the matter has already been settled, but the reason an opponent becomes defeated is because they didn't learn of it ahead of time. This is the nature of secret matters. That which is kept hidden is what we call the Flower."

    - Zeami Motokiyo, 1418 (Fūshikaden)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    233
    Likes (received)
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan Scott View Post
    Personally, every time I've tried to find a better way of teaching such arts, I've come to the realization that the old way is in fact still the best. I've proven this, to myself at least, through teaching in various ways to my own students over the last 20 years. I started off teaching using a typical modern way, and have "evolved" to the old way, which is much harder to do, but produces stronger martial artists.
    It makes a lot of sense to me. I've been active with the Aikido Schools of Ueshiba for about 11 years, the method of transmission essentially involves Sensei showing you something once and then everybody works on it and tries to figure it out. If there are 60 people on the mat there will be 60 different things being worked on for that two-five minute span. You learn how to "feel" your way through things, but you are still in a lake at night trying to swim towards shore. I think there are a lot of very positive things about this method but it is not about creating a consistent type and quality of practitioner. (It is very reminiscent of stories of how Takeda taught at certain points, particularly at the Asahi dojo, though.)

    A lot of people in my Aikido organization have been into Systema since Stan Pranin had those guys out to the Aiki Expos. Rather than the spontaneous kata of the ASU instructors, those folks like to create these drills that are sort of puzzles that you need to figure out how to make work yourself. So there is more "feeling your way through" and less attempting to fit a form.

    I think a lot of folks in gendai budo misunderstand how deep and complex paired kata training is. If the kata is sufficiently well developed such that the senior practitioner or instructor can carefully adjust the intensity and general goals of the kata, you can get years of practice out of a single one, just continually peeling back layers, and improving basic skills.

    The other thing about kata is that it really seems to be the best way to teach truly nasty, damaging techniques. This goes against current conventional wisdom - how could it possibly be good to make sure the receiver of a technique attacks in a very specific, scripted manner? A real opponent is not going to do that. But you need that so you can practice safely. if you need to learn how to apply specific pressure to a specific point after a very specific kuzushi has been established, you can't just have your uke coming in from whatever direction they want, you will never "feel your way" into the proper technique. Also, say you want to practice gouging someone's eyes, or snapping their neck. You can modify the technique such that you aren't actually maiming or killing your training partner, but you can practice visualization of what you would really be doing - but again, if you have to deal with a constantly changing attack, it is going to be much more difficult to use the visualization to install the proper technique because your body is going to be doing a variety of other things.

    If you had asked me six or seven years ago if I would be preaching the superiority of paired kata training over freestyle practice I'd have looked at you funny but as I've gotten more traditional in my training I've found nothing to dislike at all. (Well, I kind of dislike some kata I have encountered in jujutsu systems where uke makes an attack and then just stands there doing nothing as you execute three or four quick techniques on them, but I might get over that...)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    455
    Likes (received)
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cliff Judge View Post
    Yeah, this is the story. Takeda received training that was deep and wide, polished himself with a long and grueling musha shugyo, and then went on the road teach an art called Daito ryu to thousands of students. When really, the true art was a secret that he taught to only a few students, and insisted that they be careful to only teach it to a very few of their students. And so today we have millions of people training in various descendants of Takeda's Daito ryu that are training in something that is empty and not the real art.

    This is a horrible story. One of the worst things about it is the idea it plants in your head that you've wasted your years of training. If this is the case, nobody should bother training any aiki art.

    Every art has something like aiki - inner secrets that are reserved for the soke or shihans that are given to them after years of training, not before. Most students know they will never receive those particular teachings, because they are not on track to be a successor or receive a full license. But they trust that their training is immensely valuable anyway. In the old days, you had to give your people skills that they could use to survive fights. If they died because you were withholding the secrets, you wouldn't get students anymore. So there was a built-in guarantee of integrity.

    There is always this little voice in the back of your head telling you that Takeda had sort of a "there's a sucker born every minute" attitude and he was purposely selling BS. He'd get up on stage and use his aiki power to generate some technique on the spot. Then he'd rake in the money as everyone paid him three yen to learn it, then he'd laugh as he imagined them going back to their homes and practicing these useless little dances over and over again like little clockwork toys! In the meantime, he'd teach solo exercises and aiki to Ueshiba, Sagawa, Horikawa, etc, telling them that they should only pass this on to a few.

    Further down the line, you get all of this bitterness, disrespect, and factionalization. You get a huge perceived value in these secrets. People trying to scheme the rights of succession away from people they've trained alongside for decades. People breaking oaths they made to teachers.

    I re-read a thread on here from a decade ago where Wayne Muramoto.was talking about how Takenouchi ryu has always been taught at one dojo in Okayama prefecture, but there was a branching that allowed the art to be taught in some other dojos in Okayama, and then the Bichu den broke off and spread all around Japan and other parts of the world. By the 70s and 80s people from the Bichu den found out about the home dojo and - what did they do? Insist they were the real school and those people in Okayama were nobodys? Nope, they started building relationships with the home branch, everybody getting together to train together and share notes on what they were doing, to bring the art together and make it better.

    Maybe that's just a jujutsu thing.
    It could be a jujutsu thing - except nasty stories in the traditional martial arts, including jujutsu, are more common than I can count. It's a human thing, that's all.

    Of course, the story may be horrible - that has nothing to do with whether or not there's any truth to it. As Cady noted, it's an old story, common all the way back to China.

    IMO, if people are of the character to "scheme the rights of succession away from people they've trained alongside for decades" (and I'm not convinced that is happening anywhere) - they'd do that anyway, wouldn't they? In any case, even Morihei Ueshiba himself is not on ground that is all that firm in that respect.

    Best,

    Chris

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    233
    Likes (received)
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Li View Post
    IMO, if people are of the character to "scheme the rights of succession away from people they've trained alongside for decades" (and I'm not convinced that is happening anywhere) - they'd do that anyway, wouldn't they? In any case, even Morihei Ueshiba himself is not on ground that is all that firm in that respect.
    Perhaps, but in an art where it is understood that you are going to receive "regular training" and not get the secrets unless you are chosen successor, you don't attract as many people of that character.

    But I was referring to the succession controversy of mainline Daito ryu anyway. Probably overstating the issue of training alongside people.

    But really, there are huge differences between making a break from a teacher and an art and moving in your own direction, or disregarding oaths that state you are not allowed to teach unless certified to do so, or claiming you are the rightful successor of some school while knowing you are not, or leaving a school and setting up your own dojo and claiming you are the one who really understands and can teach the secrets of the school you left.

    Ueshiba broke with Daito ryu and his son continued the break, and the typical reason why some Aikido people hate this is because it means they are further away from those valuable secrets.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    455
    Likes (received)
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cliff Judge View Post
    Perhaps, but in an art where it is understood that you are going to receive "regular training" and not get the secrets unless you are chosen successor, you don't attract as many people of that character.

    But I was referring to the succession controversy of mainline Daito ryu anyway. Probably overstating the issue of training alongside people.

    But really, there are huge differences between making a break from a teacher and an art and moving in your own direction, or disregarding oaths that state you are not allowed to teach unless certified to do so, or claiming you are the rightful successor of some school while knowing you are not, or leaving a school and setting up your own dojo and claiming you are the one who really understands and can teach the secrets of the school you left.

    Ueshiba broke with Daito ryu and his son continued the break, and the typical reason why some Aikido people hate this is because it means they are further away from those valuable secrets.
    Personally, I think that, secrets or no secrets, the mainline Daito-ryu splits would have happened anyway. It's a pretty typical pattern in that kind of an organization.

    I'm not sure that I know any Aikido people who hate the break because they're further from the "secrets" - if that were true than they'd just switch to Daito-ryu (some people have, but not in any large numbers).

    More commonly, I find that people hate to see the implication of questionable behavior in someone who has traditionally been made out to be beyond approach.

    Also, many people dislike finding out that what they had always been told was a unique and original creation is somewhat less than that. That doesn't lessen the value of what it is, of course, except perhaps in perception.

    FWIW...

    Best,

    Chris

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    233
    Likes (received)
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Li View Post
    Personally, I think that, secrets or no secrets, the mainline Daito-ryu splits would have happened anyway. It's a pretty typical pattern in that kind of an organization.
    What do you mean by "that kind of an organization" and what are other examples you can give of this "typical pattern?"

    I disagree entirely. If Daito ryu didn't have layers of secrets to Aiki and the concept that they can be transmitted from teacher to student, I don't see the succession issues as happening.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Li View Post
    I'm not sure that I know any Aikido people who hate the break because they're further from the "secrets" - if that were true than they'd just switch to Daito-ryu (some people have, but not in any large numbers).
    Seriously? I mean....seriously? To both sentences.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •