The first post explains the illogical reasoning of the "qualifications" and "qualifications for comparison" argument for all parties concerned.
And also addresses the understanding of restrictions on public disclosure by many parties.
Further discussion fleshed that out
None of which should engender any animus as it recognizes all sides standards and argument points. I didn't say "talking points" because they're was little discussion, only arguing and personal attacks.
And still no discussion of aiki. There never has been and there never will be.
Dan
[url=www.bodyworkseminars.org][COLOR=#B22222][B]Ancient traditions * Modern Combatives[/B][/COLOR][B][/url] [/B][COLOR=#B22222][/COLOR]