Joshua Lerner
12th May 2003, 17:13
I came across this quote in the book "Hasidism and Modern Man" by Martin Buber. It is from a work by the Baal-Shem-Tov, the 18th century founder of modern Hasidism. It struck me as one of the most profound explanations of the relationship between tradition and personal experience I've seen, and I was wondering how people here would respond to it. I think it applies equally to the study of budo, especially koryu, and also gendai budo that put an emphasis on their history, lineage and tradition.
"Why do we say, 'Our God, and the God of our Fathers'?
"There are two kinds of men who believe in God. The one believes because it is handed down to him by his fathers, and his belief is strong. The other has come to his belief through searching. And this is the difference between them: the superiority of the first lies in the fact that his faith cannot be shattered no matter how many arguments one may bring against it, for his faith is firm because he has taken it over from his fathers; but it has a defect: that his faith is only a human command, learned without meaning and understanding. The superiority of the second lies in the fact that because he has found God through searching, he has arrived at his own faith; but for him too there remains a defect: that it is easy to shake his faith through proof to the contrary. To him who unites both, however, none is superior. Therefore we say: "Our God," because of our searching, and "God of our fathers," for the sake of our tradition.
"And thus also it is explained that we say: "God of Abraham, God of Isaac, and God of Jacob," but we do not say "God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" – by this is said: Isaac and Jacob could not rest on Abraham's tradition alone, but themselves sought the divine."
"Why do we say, 'Our God, and the God of our Fathers'?
"There are two kinds of men who believe in God. The one believes because it is handed down to him by his fathers, and his belief is strong. The other has come to his belief through searching. And this is the difference between them: the superiority of the first lies in the fact that his faith cannot be shattered no matter how many arguments one may bring against it, for his faith is firm because he has taken it over from his fathers; but it has a defect: that his faith is only a human command, learned without meaning and understanding. The superiority of the second lies in the fact that because he has found God through searching, he has arrived at his own faith; but for him too there remains a defect: that it is easy to shake his faith through proof to the contrary. To him who unites both, however, none is superior. Therefore we say: "Our God," because of our searching, and "God of our fathers," for the sake of our tradition.
"And thus also it is explained that we say: "God of Abraham, God of Isaac, and God of Jacob," but we do not say "God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" – by this is said: Isaac and Jacob could not rest on Abraham's tradition alone, but themselves sought the divine."