
Originally Posted by
M.Adil-Smith
Hi All
Has anyone read any of the three books "Famous Japanese Swordsmen" by William De Lange?
What are the views?
Are they worth getting if I'm reading up influential swordsmen and the development of fencing in feudal Japan?
Thanks
I haven't read but one of the three, but that was more than enough.
Here's the review I wrote five years ago for The Journal of Asian Martial Arts:
Enthusiasts and aficionados interested in samurai and Japanese martial art history confront a sizeable collection of books, articles and web pages competing for their time and dollars. Solid, reliable studies on these topics are, however, somewhat less abundant. Canny readers thus often find themselves to sloughing their way through a swamp of misinformation, half-truths and myth in their quests for knowledge and understanding. Those who pick up Famous Swordsmen of the Warring States Period are well-advised to bring their waders.
The book comprises two long chapters on Iizasa Chōisai Ienao and Kamiizumi Ise-no-kami Nobutsuna (né Hidetsuna); an introduction; appendices listing provinces, castles, shrines, temples, historical periods, battles and rebellions cited in the text; and a glossary. The title notwithstanding, de Lange offers his readers very little information about either of these famous swordsmen or about martial art history. He devotes only 26 pages to Iizasa, 30 pages to Kamiizumi, and fewer than a dozen more pages to other noteworthy pioneers of ryūha bugei, including Matsumoto Bizen-no-kami Masanobu, Tsukahara Bokuden, Aisu Ikōsai Hisatada, and the Yagyū family. Only a small percentage of this material, moreover, focuses on these figures as martial artists, or on the schools they created. The Iizasa sections contain far more information on his family than on Ienao himself, while the Kamiizumi sections mostly recount his military career and the campaigns of Takeda Shingen and Uesugi Kenshin.
To be fair, de Lange warns readers up front that his story is not just about famous swordsmen per se. His real aim is, rather, “to place these men firmly back in their proper context, in the place and time in which they lived, and, in doing so, recapture some of the atmosphere of the Warring States period” (p. xii).
But while this is indeed a worthwhile objective, de Lange has clearly not done the homework necessary to deliver on his promises. The book, which surveys the history of the samurai from the Taira Masakado and Fujiwara Sumitomo insurrections in the mid-tenth centuries through Oda Nobunaga’s campaigns in the late sixteenth, is based entirely on long-outdated textbooks and survey histories (including Sir George Sansom’s three volume History of Japan, written in the 1950s), literary accounts of early samurai battles, commercial books about the samurai and/or the bugei in English and Japanese, and a tiny handful of Japanese scholarly works on early samurai history. De Lange has completely ignored the sizeable body of scholarship (even the substantial literature published in English) that emerged between the 1970s and the early 2000s, and has handled what he did read credulously, uncritically, or misapprehensively.
The resulting product is a romp through Japanese military history that would make any well-read reader’s head ache: a quirky fusion of legends, misconceptions and assumptions that historians have refuted years—in some cases, decades—ago. The errors range from broad conceptions—such as the assertion that the Kamakura shogunate essentially displaced the imperial court as the government of Japan—to minor-but-telling points—such as his identification of Iizasa Ienao as “Iizasa Yamashiro” (which apparently stems from conflating one of Ienao’s honorary titles, Yamashiro-no-kami, or Governor of Yamashiro province, with a given name)—to silly factual errors, such as his description of the Heian Grand Shrine in Kyoto, founded in 1895, as being “among the oldest and most prominent [shrines] in the country” (p. 50). It would require a book-length essay to catalog and explain all of the historiographical mistakes in this slim volume, but the upshot is that well-informed readers will be confused, amused or annoyed by this very strange history, and those new to the subject will be seriously misinformed.
De Lange does provide some useful and interesting information on the Iizasa family, the Yagyū family, and Kamiizumi Nobutsuna, mostly amalgamated from biographical anthologies in Japanese. Much of this data is, however, already available in other English-language sources. There just is not enough new material here to justify the price of admission or the effort required to cull the factual wheat from the erroneous chaff.
In sum, Famous Swordsmen of the Warring States Period is, to steal a phrase from Sir Winston Churchill, a book “with much to be modest about.” I cannot recommend it.