If you're an Okinawa Karate practitioner and curious about politics, you've probably read the links wherein Patrick Mc Carthy describes Yabiku Takaya, who was once Soken's personal secretary (according to John Sells in <u>Unante: the Secrets of Karate</u> having offered him a rank cert. with Hohan Soken's seal and signed with his name. Mc Carthy spars no shock in describing the baffling incident.
There is also an American teacher (I'm omitting his name because I can't remember it, not because I want to protect him. I'll edit it in later) who claims to have Soken's original seal, and issues certificates which he says were signed & sealed by the now-deceased masterteacher (d.1982) before his passing. Needless to say, he also claims to have the only 10th dan certificate signed by Soken, 'though most others who studies under Soken remember him as a junior man, and it is doubtful he could have communicated with Soken.
I know nobody from the Matsumura Seito traditions is going to appreciate this comparison, but to me it looks like the memory of Hohan Soken is fast joining that of Shimabuku Tatsuo (Isshinryu). Nowadays, who knows if a Soken Certificate is valid, certainly a personal hanko provides no guarantee or validation. How can one tell the real thing from a backdated maybe-presigned/stamped cert? Obviously using a dead man's signature to ascribe approval is not an honest thing to do--especially a dead man who people claim to love and respect. What is this doing to the authenticity of Soken's teachings and how are M.S. lineage folks and Okinawa karate practitioners among us dealing with it?